Towards better reliability in fetal heart rate variability using time domain and spectral domain analyses. A new method for assessing fetal neurological state?

OBJECTIVES: Fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) has shown potential in fetal surveillance. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of time domain and spectral domain parameters based on non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-FECG). METHOD: NI-FECG, with a sampling frequency of 1 kHz, was obtained in 75 healthy, singleton pregnant women between gestational age (GA) 20(+0) to 41(+0). The recording was divided into a) heart rate pattern (HRP) and b) periods fulfilling certain criteria of stationarity of RR-intervals, termed stationary heart rate pattern (SHRP). Within each recording, the first and the last time series from each HRP with less than 5% artifact correction were analyzed and compared. Standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR-intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), high frequency power (HF-power), low frequency power (LF-power), and LF-power/HF-power were performed. A multivariate mixed model was used and acceptable reliability was defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.80 and a coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 15%. Based on these results, the CV and ICC were computed if the average of two to six time series was used. RESULTS: For GA 28(+0) to 34(+6), SDNN and RMSSD exhibited acceptable reliability (CV 90%), whereas GA 35(+0) to 41(+0)and 20(+0) to 27(+6) showed higher CVs. Spectral domain parameters also showed high CVs However, by using the mean value of two to six time series, acceptable reliability in SDNN, RMSSD and HF-power from GA 28(+0) was achieved. Stationarity of RR-intervals showed high influence on reliability and SHRP was superior to HRP, whereas the length of the time series showed minor influence. CONCLUSION: Acceptable reliability seems achievable in SDNN, RMSSD and HF-power from gestational week 28. However, stationarity of RR-intervals should be considered when selecting time series for analyses

Fetal respiratory movements improve reliability of heart rate variability and suggest a coupling between fetal respiratory arrhythmia and vagal activity

Fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) reflects autonomic cardiac regulation. The autonomic nervous system constantly adjusts the heart rate to maintain homeostasis. By providing insight into the fetal autonomic state, FHRV has the potential to become an investigational and clinical instrument. However, the method needs standardization and the influence of fetal movements, including fetal respiratory movements, is not well explored. Therefore, in a highly standardized setting, the aim was to evaluate the association between fetal movements and fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) including their impact on reliability. Fetal heart rate was obtained by noninvasive fetal electrocardiography (NI‐FECG) and fetal movements by simultaneous ultrasound scanning in 30 healthy singleton pregnant women on two occasions with a maximum interval of 7 days. The standard deviation of normal‐to‐normal RR‐intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive RR‐interval differences (RMDDS), high‐frequency power (HF‐power), low‐frequency power (LF‐power), and LF/HF were measured. A multivariate mixed model was used and reliability was defined as acceptable by a coefficient of variance (CV) ≤15% and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ≥0.80. During time periods with fetal respiratory movements, the highest reliability was achieved. Intra‐ and inter‐observer reliability measurements were very high (CV: 0–9%; ICC ≧ 0.86). Within the same recording, SDNN and RMSSD achieved acceptable reliability (CV: 14–15%; ICC ≧ 0.80). However, day‐to‐day reliability displayed high CV’s. In time periods with fetal respiratory movements, as compared to periods with quiescence RMSSD and HF‐power were higher (Ratio: 1.33–2.03) and LF/HF power lower (Ratio: 0.54). In periods with fetal body movements SDNN, RMSSD and HF‐power were higher (Ratio: 1.27–1.65). In conclusion, time periods with fetal respiratory movements were associated with high reliability of FHRV analyses and the highest values of parameters supposed to represent vagal activity

Growth-restricted human fetuses have preserved respiratory sinus arrhythmia but reduced heart rate variability estimates of vagal activity during quiescence

The aim was to assess the association between fetal growth restriction (FGR) and fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) in relation to fetal movements. A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Non‐invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI‐FECG) allowed beat‐to‐beat assessments with <5% corrections of RR intervals. FHRV analyses included: Root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD), high frequency power (HF power), and low frequency power (LF power). Fetal movements were categorized by continuous ultrasound scanning. We enrolled 36 singleton pregnant women expecting a small fetus (< the 2.3 percentile of mean weight for gestational age) diagnosed by ultrasound, of whom 25 presented with a birthweight < the 2.3 percentile. Among these, 11 were excluded due to low quality NI‐FECG recordings, leaving 14 women with 28 recordings eligible for inclusion in the analyses. The control group consisted of 22 healthy fetuses with birthweights between the 10th and the 90th percentile (average for gestational age [AGA]). In FGR fetuses the HRV response to respiratory activity was comparable to that of AGA fetuses. RMSSD (Ratio 1.54 [95% CI: 1.33; 1.79]) and HF power (Ratio 2.88 [95% CI: 2.12; 3.91]) increased, whereas LF/HF power (Ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.31;0.63]) decreased. However, during fetal quiescence, FGR fetuses differed significantly from AGA fetuses. Compared to AGA fetuses, FGR fetuses displayed lower RMSSD (Ratio 0.77 (95% CI: 0.58; 1.02)) and HF power (Ratio 0.56 (95% CI:0.32; 0.98)). This reduction was associated with the severity of the FGR. In conclusion, FGR fetuses displayed a respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) comparable to AGA fetuses; however, more important, parameters representing cardiac vagal activity were impaired in FGR fetuses during quiescence. RSA may constitute an intrinsic function of the cardiovascular system, which is unaffected by fetal compromise. However, the basic cardiac outflow assessed during fetal quiescence indicates a suppressed cardiac vagal activity in the FGR fetuses

Short-Term Therapies for Treatment of Acute and Advanced Heart Failure—Why so Few Drugs Available in Clinical Use, Why Even Fewer in the Pipeline?

Both acute and advanced heart failure are an increasing threat in term of survival, quality of life and socio-economical burdens. Paradoxically, the use of successful treatments for chronic heart failure can prolong life but—per definition—causes the rise in age of patients experiencing acute decompensations, since nothing at the moment helps avoiding an acute or final stage in the elderly population. To complicate the picture, acute heart failure syndromes are a collection of symptoms, signs and markers, with different aetiologies and different courses, also due to overlapping morbidities and to the plethora of chronic medications. The palette of cardio- and vasoactive drugs used in the hospitalization phase to stabilize the patient’s hemodynamic is scarce and even scarcer is the evidence for the agents commonly used in the practice (e.g., catecholamines). The pipeline in this field is poor and the clinical development chronically unsuccessful. Recent set backs in expected clinical trials for new agents in acute heart failure (AHF) (omecamtiv, serelaxine, ularitide) left a field desolately empty, where only few drugs have been approved for clinical use, for example, levosimendan and nesiritide. In this consensus opinion paper, experts from 26 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, U.K. and Ukraine) analyse the situation in details also by help of artificial intelligence applied to bibliographic searches, try to distil some lesson-learned to avoid that future projects would make the same mistakes as in the past and recommend how to lead a successful development project in this field in dire need of new agents

Short-Term Therapies for Treatment of Acute and Advanced Heart Failure—Why so Few Drugs Available in Clinical Use, Why Even Fewer in the Pipeline?

Both acute and advanced heart failure are an increasing threat in term of survival, quality of life and socio-economical burdens. Paradoxically, the use of successful treatments for chronic heart failure can prolong life but—per definition—causes the rise in age of patients experiencing acute decompensations, since nothing at the moment helps avoiding an acute or final stage in the elderly population. To complicate the picture, acute heart failure syndromes are a collection of symptoms, signs and markers, with different aetiologies and different courses, also due to overlapping morbidities and to the plethora of chronic medications. The palette of cardio- and vasoactive drugs used in the hospitalization phase to stabilize the patient’s hemodynamic is scarce and even scarcer is the evidence for the agents commonly used in the practice (e.g., catecholamines). The pipeline in this field is poor and the clinical development chronically unsuccessful. Recent set backs in expected clinical trials for new agents in acute heart failure (AHF) (omecamtiv, serelaxine, ularitide) left a field desolately empty, where only few drugs have been approved for clinical use, for example, levosimendan and nesiritide. In this consensus opinion paper, experts from 26 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, U.K. and Ukraine) analyse the situation in details also by help of artificial intelligence applied to bibliographic searches, try to distil some lesson-learned to avoid that future projects would make the same mistakes as in the past and recommend how to lead a successful development project in this field in dire need of new agents

Guillain-Barré syndrome and adjuvanted pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccines: A multinational self-controlled case series in Europe

BACKGROUND: The risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following the United States' 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign in the USA led to enhanced active surveillance during the pandemic influenza (A(H1N1)pdm09) immunization campaign. This study aimed to estimate the risk of GBS following influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. METHODS: A self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis was performed in Denmark, Finland, France, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Information was collected according to a common protocol and standardised procedures. Cases classified at levels 1-4a of the Brighton Collaboration case definition were included. The risk window was 42 days starting the day after vaccination. Conditional Poisson regression and pooled random effects models estimated adjusted relative incidences (RI). Pseudo likelihood and vaccinated-only methods addressed the potential contraindication for vaccination following GBS. RESULTS: Three hundred and three (303) GBS and Miller Fisher syndrome cases were included. Ninety-nine (99) were exposed to A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination, which was most frequently adjuvanted (Pandemrix and Focetria). The unadjusted pooled RI for A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and GBS was 3.5 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.2-5.5), based on all countries. This lowered to 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2-3.1) after adjustment for calendartime and to 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1-3.2) when we accounted for contra-indications. In a subset (Netherlands, Norway, and United Kingdom) we further adjusted for other confounders and there the RI decreased from 1.7 (adjusted for calendar month) to 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7-2.8), which is the main finding. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the potential of conducting European collaborative vaccine safety studies. The main, fully adjusted analysis, showed that the RI of GBS was not significantly elevated after influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination (RI = 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7-2.8). Based on the upper limits of the pooled estimate we can rule out with 95% certainty that the number of excess GBS cases after influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination would be more than 3 per million vaccinated